Are you stuck in the system also?

RaginRanger will respond to any comment--on any post--asking for help on your situation.
This blog "moderates" posts, meaning that your post will NOT be posted publicly if you request that your question remain private.

I am not a lawyer, but I have been in this fight long enough to at least point you to help in most cases. I'll help write a Memorandum For Record and/or the Commander if needed. Sometimes just getting a new perspective from someone who's been there, but doesn't have personal ties to
you, can make things more clear.

The most important thing is for those of us who have made it through, to be here for those still fighting through ~
Showing posts with label Vet Pac. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Vet Pac. Show all posts

07 March 2007

Making the problem worse

Everyone's hoppin' and poppin' in DC now trying to looks busy, trying to look like they care, trying to make it look like they have been doing their jobs all along.
Stop trying to cover your tracks!! You're wasting time generating lies for press releases, just fix the problems.
The major problem that is destroying the medical system right now is the leadership. It just plain sucks. And there is no accountability of that leadership. The President answers to NO ONE - he's made that crystal clear, but with all that authority, where is his responsibility.
And then the head of the VA has obviously had his head up someone's ass, if not his own.

After meeting with the president, Nicholson defended the Veterans Administration, but acknowledged there is room for improvement.

"When you're seeing over 1 million patients a week, you have to be very good, and if there is any one patient who doesn't get the care that they deserve, that's unacceptable," Nicholson said

He said his agency is hiring 100 new patient advocates who will help troops returning from war deal with the bureaucracy.

"The American people can feel very good about the health care system that their VA is providing to veterans," Nicholson said, "but if there is a case where a veteran gets lost in the system, or suffers anxiety or their family does as a result of something we're not doing, that is unacceptable."

From:

Bush: No Tolerance for Medical Neglect

By DEB RIECHMANN
The Associated Press
Wednesday, March 7, 2007; 1:46 PM


By saying a patient is not getting the necessary care he is basically admitting that his whole organization is a failure.

And now he's hiring 100 more "advocates." The VA doesn't have advocates. The VA has bureaucrats. If a patient is to have a proper advocate - a person who will actually look out for the Patient's BEST INTEREST - not the interest of the institution, then that advocate cannot come from within the VA PERIOD!

The DAV (Disabled American Veterans) and the VFW help Vets fight the VA bullshit - THEY have advocates and representatives that act on patients' behalves.

And why are we changing the subject to the VA, anyway? Their system is in desperate need of repair, too, but Walter Reed is TOTALLY separate from the VA.

The problems at WRAMC are with ACTIVE DUTY Soldiers - and WRAMC is supposed to help them heal to a STABLE STATE where then the VA can help provide further medical care after the soldier leaves the service.

02 March 2007

You do the math

So Bush wants to take this opportunity to talk about how he has grown the VA budget under his administration -- Way wrong answer for those paying attention. He forgot to mention that the budget increase (decrease) is due to the increased co-pays and the decreased per-vet spending for the VA. The numbers of disabled Vets are growing faster than the budget is increasing, so claiming to increase the budget is BULLSHIT!!
Bush also will emphasize in the address that more than 1 million veterans have been brought into the Veterans Administration health care system since 2001 and that his fiscal 2008 budget proposal includes a request for more than $86 billion for veterans' services, representing a 77 percent increase since he took office.

---Bush Orders Review of Service Members' Care
By William Branigin

Washington Post Staff Writer
Friday, March 2, 2007; 5:18 PM


29 September 2006

National Symposium for the Needs of Young Veterans

Lots of Veteran's advocacy groups going to this. I'm looking forward to it and hope it brings strong positive results.

National Symposium for the Needs of Young Veterans
' official Web site. This first-of-its kind event will be hosted by AMVETS on Oct. 18-21 at the Hyatt Regency O'Hare (please use special event code 26168 for the best rate) in Chicago.

One of the greatest and yet largely unrecognized challenges facing America is how we will provide for the needs of future veterans—especially those younger people who are serving in Iraq, Afghanistan and other parts of the world today. It’s an issue we must address now if our nation is to keep its promise to those who defend us.

Homepage:
http://www.veteransnationalsymposium.org/home.htm


- Ragin' Ranger Out

21 August 2006

Call me, ask me, I want to help you, too!!

One morning I woke up to a phone call. I felt very much "cloak and dagger" when the voice on the other line said "I'm having trouble at the hospital and someone told me to call this number. Do I have the right person?" The wise guy side of me wanted to respond with "who are you looking for," or better still, "is this for pick-up or delivery?" But I knew exactly why he was calling.
My wife and I have been through a very ugly medical situation with our army hospital. Only strong expletives could accurately describe how I feel. So I knew this caller had heard something about us.
He went on to describe how the doctor he saw told him that "back pain is normal in the army," and "you'll just have to learn to live with it." And that was it. When the first doctor left the hospital for another assignment this soldier got another doctor. Instead of a real second opinion the second doctor just said "well if you've already been seen there is nothing more I can do for you." And now, because of his intense pain, he will be separated from the army.

Second opinions are hard to come by in the army. If a soldier is fortunate enough to be granted one the second doc will often just defer to the opinion of the first doc. It's just easier that way. It separates soldiers faster and is cheaper. The misconception that "the VA will take care of disabled vets," must be the only threads left holding these doctors' consciences together.

check out this site if you think the VA is doing its job: www.dav.org

I've been out for over 8 months and I still haven't seen a dime from VA for some of my well-documented disabilities.

In a nutshell on claims: I developed acid reflux during service. The VA considered that condition "service connected," which means the VA will assume responsibility for treating my indigestion at VA clinics and the VA pays for my antacid meds.
However, the VA claims that my bone spurs and joint degeneration in my neck (from wearing a Kevlar Helmet and Body Armor) is not service connected. I guess back pain just happens!?!?

It does according to the VA.

Disability ratings are based on two measures: subjective pain scale (1-10) and objective range of motion.
In the civilian world doctors use objective functional assessments to determine the effects of a patient's disability. These examinations often span a period of time (at least 2 days) and monitor many motions and actions on each day. Using this method gives and accurate description of how a patient's disability affects their activities of daily living (ADLs).

But the Army won't use this method!!

WHY is the easy question, at least it seems to be -- MONEY. A functional assessment would likely show higher disability ratings for veterans and that would increase VA spending greatly. The VA budget is a joke already. The VA will fight increasing disability ratings as long as it can. The current payments for disability is already sad as it is.
Check it out here: http://www.vba.va.gov/bln/21/Rates/comp01.htm

As you can see, a lone veteran who is 100% disabled gets $2,393.00 per month. That is tax free, but how far can that really go? That's $28,716 a year. Increases to that come at Congress's leisure.
Is that really the best America can do to reward a kid who went to war (perhaps didn't even want to go) and came home with a disability so bad that they can't work again, EVER, AT ALL!?!?!?!? And what of their mental health, family life, recreation, and overall quality of life!?!?!?!? There is no dollar amount worthy of the sense of wholeness and many vets feel themselves to be in pieces, broken shards of war's destruction.

Where else can this disabled vet get money?
Hopefully the Army retired them from active duty -- not a guarantee. A young soldier with 4 years of active duty service can get $514 a month for being considered 30% or more disabled by the Army. There is some fuzzy math that goes into these calculations but now this disabled vet is up to $29,230 a year.

Some perks come with this: guaranteed medical treatment, but how much does a disabled vet trust the Army's medical system. PX and Commissary privileges as a retiree but if the vet wants to get away from the seedy Army town this means little to nothing.

And that is sad considering all that this person sacrificed.

In all of my anger at the Army's medical system I remind myself that my personal experience wasn't too bad. I had a great surgeon who I trusted and fixed my shoulders very well. I just can't do certain Army tasks now. (But who really should carry an 80 lb. pack!?!?) I loved the physically demanding environment of the Infantry, my body just couldn't hang together any more.
I also had cartilage removed from my knee -- I was rucking (back-packing) exactly 6 weeks later. For those of you familiar with the Sapper School road march course at Ft. Leonard Wood, MO, I finished it in 2:45 (2nd place) only 2 and a half months out from surgery. Those docs did a great job!!



- Ragin' Ranger Out

My Blogger Panel